<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fuzzy Logic &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetacticalnuke.com/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetacticalnuke.com</link>
	<description>Because things aren&#039;t confusing enough...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:52:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Apple uses CT</title>
		<link>http://www.thetacticalnuke.com/2010/07/apple-uses-ct/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetacticalnuke.com/2010/07/apple-uses-ct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computed Tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetacticalnuke.com/2010/07/apple-uses-ct/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tweeted about this, but it was so cool I thought it deserved its own post. While the rest of Apple&#8217;s press conference yesterday was pretty worthless (27 minutes of &#8220;there is no problem&#8221; and 3 minutes of &#8220;here&#8217;s your stupid case&#8221;), there was a pretty interesting part of an Engadget article that was posted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tweeted about this, but it was so cool I thought it deserved its own post. While the rest of Apple&#8217;s press conference yesterday was pretty worthless (27 minutes of &#8220;there is no problem&#8221; and 3 minutes of &#8220;here&#8217;s your stupid case&#8221;), there was a pretty interesting part of an <a href="http://i.engadget.com/2010/07/16/inside-apples-black-lab-wireless-testing-facilities/">Engadget article</a> that was posted later. </p>
<p>Evidently Apple uses computed tomography to scan the insides of their devices when they are undergoing testing. Seeing as how I also use CT to scan cargo containers, I thought that was pretty  damn cool. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetacticalnuke.com/2010/07/apple-uses-ct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu easier to use than OS X?</title>
		<link>http://www.thetacticalnuke.com/2008/06/ubuntu-easier-to-use-than-os-x/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetacticalnuke.com/2008/06/ubuntu-easier-to-use-than-os-x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 03:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetacticalnuke.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was browsing Digg this morning and found a rather interesting story with some random guy (evidently a &#8216;Matthew Daly&#8217; in the UK) about how he thought his Ubuntu installation was easier to use than OS X.  In fact, his exact statement was:
A modern beginner-oriented Linux distribution such as Ubuntu is considerably easier to use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was browsing Digg this morning and found a <a href="http://farbeyondtheedgeofreason.blogspot.com/2008/06/ubuntu-is-easier-to-use-than-mac.html" target="_blank">rather interesting story</a> with some random guy (evidently a &#8216;Matthew Daly&#8217; in the UK) about how he thought his Ubuntu installation was easier to use than OS X.  In fact, his exact statement was:</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial;">A modern beginner-oriented Linux distribution such as Ubuntu is considerably easier to use than a Mac. </span></p></blockquote>
<p>Now, I am a huge Linux guy.  I love my T61 Thinkpad running Ubuntu (formerly Gutsy, now Hardy).  I&#8217;ve had the laptop for almost a year exactly and have had Ubuntu on it ever since the first Ubuntu 7.10 RC releases and couldn&#8217;t be happier.  It gives me, a very very cranky power user, exactly what I want.  That being said, I just <em>don&#8217;t</em> agree that it is easier to use for new users than OS X.  In fact, I think they both are horrible for new users.</p>
<p><span id="more-14"></span></p>
<p>Part of the problem is that we must first define what a &#8216;new&#8217; user is.  Clearly it is very hard to imagine anyone in the US, let alone most of the developed world, that has never had any contact with a normal desktop computer.  So, for the purposes of this post, I&#8217;m going to assume that a &#8216;new user&#8217; is a normal person who has used their (Windows) computer for browsing the internet, managing email, writing Word/Excel documents, and maybe downloading pictures from their camera.  Unfortunately, that is all many people use their computer for.  Many of us who are very computer-savvy forget that some things are just confusing because those who are less informed don&#8217;t fully understand the technology.  If a novice user sees a pop-up that says they have spyware and they can &#8220;GET RID OF IT BY CLICKING HERE!&#8221; then they&#8217;re going to do it because that <em>sounds scary</em>.  They&#8217;re not going to know that a random pop-up ad has no chance of finding spyware, they&#8217;re just going to know that someone is telling them that their computer is messed up and, as a result, they&#8217;re going to attempt to fix it.  All of this adds to the problem of usability.<br />
1. <em>The Desktop</em>:The problem with the Ubuntu Desktop, compared to the OS X desktop, is that it is very sparse as shipped.  This is great for Linux diehards, but for someone who wants to use Linux like Windows they&#8217;re going to initially be confused.  Why would they look up to the top bar when they&#8217;re always used to going to the bottom-left and clicking the start button?  At least OS X keeps their bar on the bottom.  On top of that, at least the Mac starts with certain applications initially on the screen.  Ubuntu doesn&#8217;t give you anything like that.</p>
<p>2. <em>Installing New Software</em>: I&#8217;ll give Matthew this point.  Ubuntu is definitely better in this regard.  The .dmg format is slightly confusing for new users.  At least .deb seems to work fairly well&#8211;if you double click the file then Ubuntu handles it very well.</p>
<p>3. <em>Compiling from Source</em>:  I don&#8217;t think that this is really a consideration that should be taken with new users.  There&#8217;s no reason they would need to compile things and, if they did, they aren&#8217;t new users.  Hell, even trying to get people to understand what the hell &#8216;compiling&#8217; source meant would be confusing&#8211;and we&#8217;re not even going to start working on what they would have to do to get all of the dependencies for various software.</p>
<p>4. <em>Out of the box functionality</em>:  I agree with Matthew that it&#8217;s a slightly unfair comparison because of the different situations.  For instance, Ubuntu on old/weird hardware is going to be a completely different experience than getting it pre-installed on a new Dell machine.  Of course, the same can be said of OS X as a &#8216;hackintosh&#8217; instead of on native apple hardware.  For that reason, I&#8217;ll let this point go.</p>
<p>5. <em>Greater range of pre-installed applications</em>: This is true although I&#8217;d argue some of them don&#8217;t meet the quality/polish of Mac OS X.</p>
<p>6. <em>Better support of third party media players</em>:  Maybe this is just me being me, but <strong>people have iPods</strong>.  iPods outnumber everything else, last time I checked.  I know that when I tried Amarok a few months ago, probably around January, that it wouldn&#8217;t do many of the things that I wanted it to do (album art on my 5.5G iPod, it split up podcasts into multiple injuries, various other things).  iTunes <strong>works</strong>, plain and simple.</p>
<p>I love Ubuntu and wouldn&#8217;t want to use OS X, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s (yet) fair to say that Linux is easier for a completely new user than OS X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetacticalnuke.com/2008/06/ubuntu-easier-to-use-than-os-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

